An Introduction to the Psychology of Centralized Structure (PCS) Written by : Hadi Bostan

Chapter One

Psychology of centralized structure

 

Defective structure

 

It is very difficult for a person to express his ideas and to tries to prove his theory, simply and without wasting time and energy, in today's world. Because there are many inefficient and unnecessary things that a person is required to do in order to be able to prove his/her views against people who are skilled imitators and consider themselves omniscient. Finally, the continuous and exhausting efforts that are really unnecessary cause the determined hierarchy to cause fatigue and boredom of the person and those are an obstacle in front of him/her. Is there a better solution to replace it? The answer is no at the moment, despite the current mechanism. This is an example of a defective mechanism and a mechanism for purposeful actualization, which some cases of it can be seen in all stages of the current cycle of human life. In other words, it summarizes a person's usual process of starvation to education and the acquisition of skills and knowledge, and even the general process life as the birth, fear of death and then death, respectively. If we want to think about these cases with a purely logical view and in the form of cause and effect manner, we have practically analyzed a defective and aimless cycle. And if a person comes to a full understanding of these results, he/she either seeks an answer, or despairs of absolute absurdity. Then, no psychologist or doctor will be able to treat him/her. So what is the problem? I’ll tell you it. But unfortunately we must first begin with a fundamental and general review of current theories of psychology, the philosophy of mechanisms, and the correct structure of the human psyche to state the final problem.

Throughout human history, trial and error has always been the first and simplest way to find the right path for man. But sometimes these errors have looked like a collection and created a social norm. This is not related to a race, sect or a particular civilization, but it has started from the beginning of the formation of the humans (Homo sapiens) and has created a global dilemma to this day. Maybe this method has caused us to achieve our demands, but we have definitely chosen the best method, and this is quite visible in the chaotic psychosocial status of humanity. But if we want to state a very clear reason for this subject in a very simple terms at the beginning of the matter, we can conclude on the basis of the theory of evolution that pre homo sapiens beings recognition means (Sensory behavior (are much older, more effective, more structured, and more inflexible than homo sapiens beings available means) Logical thinking), due to their simpler structure. So, they will have a greater impact on behavior.

Animals may be trapped by human in the same way thousands of times and each time they behave the same according to the sensory means and do not learn a lesson from the previous events. Unless our behavior to be such that it causes the animal to be harassed and conditioned. Such as Pavlov's Dog experiments and the classical conditioning. the foundation of the modern science available to humanity around what is happening in the human psyche has been created by Aristotle, Titchener, Descartes, Freud, Jung, or various theories such as machinist, structuralism, behaviorism, evolution, psychoanalysis. And it has been established by many thinkers, theorists, scientific movements, and various theories about anthropology and semantics in human existence and different scientific and laboratory models of behavior to this day. The cases mentioned above are the small and, of course, very important part of the numerous cases that have logically formed a part of history according to their time thinking. Besides, there are many other cases that are not necessary to be mentioned in this book, but perhaps it can be said that the greatest objection to previous theories and ideas in psychology is that they all are classified on the basis of signs and effects and those are presented in a symbolic expression. For this reason we see that some approaches and theories, although they contain a large part of incomprehensible ambiguities and complexities, simply because they address the collective needs. The approaches have been raised everywhere and have become a principle. For example, what do we know about Freud's subconscious? Except that there is a hidden part within each of us that we take responsibility for all our strange and selfish mistakes, errors and behaviors and just take advantage of its ignorance?

A theory and a community of victims; Perhaps understanding this concept can help humanity to find a new path; However, Stephen Karpman has already referred to this subject from his point of view in the theory of games.

A symbolic look at a scientific subject may be effective in solving some problems, but its biggest drawback is that it always observes a part of the whole and draws conclusions according to it. There are many notable examples such as the Blind Men and the Elephant in Rumi's Masnavi that have practically been mentioned as the basic and important keywords of general knowledge and current knowledge of psychology. And they have practically prevented a wide range of mental illnesses from being treated completely and in a timely manner and have created a platform for the growth of superstitions, false beliefs and erroneous beliefs, due to lack of response and explanation and justification of many situations that have occurred.so, who is the main culprit? It is certainly not related to Freud, Jung, Powell, or Watson, and other theorists, but to all those who, as therapists, psychologists, counselors, and university professors that have merely studied, accepted, and applied these in a parrot-like manner.  Of course, there are exceptions, but as the name implies it is an exception. But another important question that is being discussed is what the reason for these situations is and why the number of thinkers and theorists has been less than past in the present era? Do we really face a shortage of theorists and scientists?

Many of the questions that have been raised in this book need to be discussed extensively, but what cannot be ignored are the dire situation and the declining state of the human psyche. Perhaps one of its reasons is an effect with the same name; a cycle that repeats in such a way that every time we open our eyes to the bitter reality, we close our eyes and ignore it. For example, a driver who is driving fast and carelessly and encounters a heartbreaking scene of a car accident in the middle of the road, leave the scene quickly instead of slowing down, watching and learning a lesson. He/she tries not to accept the possible consequences of his/her behavior and the result of his/her action, without any supervision. In fact, none of us has to watch the consequences that leads to the destruction of our survival process, and we decide not to watch and not accept many facts. I hate exaggeration, just as much as excessive hearing. I am more interested in observation, comparison, and adaptation, and the theories and hypotheses ahead are generally discovered, compiled, and structured on this basis, and I will not make any commitment immutability or even completely rejecting my views based on the passing of time and more observation.